Late-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: School life expectancy, tertiary, female

Late-demographic dividend
2.89 years
in 2019
New Zealand
4.91 years
in 2018
Late-demographic dividend rank
13th
New Zealand rank
11th

School life expectancy, tertiary, female over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • New Zealand
012345197019942019

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 4.91 years against 2.89 years in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 2.02 years.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 13th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 45 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4189 years 0.9438 years 0.5249 years New Zealand
1980s 0.4185 years 1.52 years 1.1 years New Zealand
1990s 0.4981 years 2.86 years 2.36 years New Zealand
2010s 2.52 years 4.83 years 2.31 years New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher school life expectancy, tertiary, female, Late-demographic dividend or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 4.91 years against 2.89 years in Late-demographic dividend as of 2018.
What is the difference in school life expectancy, tertiary, female between Late-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
2.02 years, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
28 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2018.
How do Late-demographic dividend and New Zealand rank globally for school life expectancy, tertiary, female?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 13th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as School life expectancy, tertiary, female (years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: School life expectancy, tertiary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/school-life-expectancy-tertiary-female-years/late-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/school-life-expectancy-tertiary-female-years/late-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/">Late-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: School life expectancy, tertiary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
School life expectancy, tertiary, female (years)
Unit
years
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
222 places, 6,910 data points, 1970–2020
Last refreshed

Number of years a person of school entrance age can expect to spend within the specified level of education. For a child of a certain age a, the school life expectancy is calculated as the sum of the age specific enrolment rates for the levels of education specified. The part of the enrolment that is not distributed by age is divided by the school-age population for the level of education they are enrolled in, and multiplied by the duration of that level of education. The result is then added to the sum of the age-specific enrolment rates. A relatively high SLE indicates greater probability for children to spend more years in education and higher overall retention within the education system. It must be noted that the expected number of years does not necessarily coincide with the expected number of grades of education completed, because of repetition. Since school life expectancy is an average based on participation in different levels of education, the expected number of years of schooling may be pulled down by the magnitude of children who never go to school. Those children who are in school may benefit from many more years of education than the average.