Malaysia vs Rwanda: Share of schools with adaptations for disabled students

Malaysia
49.5%
in 2023
Rwanda
72.7%
in 2023
Malaysia rank
34th
Rwanda rank
31st

Share of schools with adaptations for disabled students over time

  • Malaysia
  • Rwanda
020406080201620192023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 72.7% against 49.5% in Malaysia, a difference of 23.2%.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.5 times Malaysia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 40 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 30.8% 37.7% 6.9% Rwanda
2020s 47.5% 71.0% 23.6% Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of schools with adaptations for disabled students, Malaysia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 72.7% against 49.5% in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in share of schools with adaptations for disabled students between Malaysia and Rwanda?
23.2%, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for share of schools with adaptations for disabled students?
Malaysia ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of schools with adaptations for disabled students. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of schools with adaptations for disabled students
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
40 places, 293 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of schools with access to adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities, by education level (%)