East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Macau, China: Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
7.51 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Macau, China
780.3 units per square kilometre
in 2018
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
5th
Macau, China rank
2nd

Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Macau, China
05001.0k1.5k197019942018

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 780.3 units per square kilometre against 7.51 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 772.79 units per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 103.9 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 2nd of 41 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Macau, China Difference Ahead
1970s 3.6 units per square kilometre 440.14 units per square kilometre 436.54 units per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 4.96 units per square kilometre 1,053 units per square kilometre 1,048 units per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 7.58 units per square kilometre 1,493 units per square kilometre 1,485 units per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 7.42 units per square kilometre 1,017 units per square kilometre 1,010 units per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 780.3 units per square kilometre against 7.51 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Macau, China?
772.79 units per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Macau, China?
32 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2018.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Macau, China rank globally for secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 2nd of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Macau, China: Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-general-pupils-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-general-pupils-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/macao-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Macau, China: Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 9,094 data points, 1970–2019
Last refreshed

Secondary education, general pupils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.