Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre

Saint Kitts and Nevis
16.06 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Trinidad and Tobago
16.05 units per square kilometre
in 2010
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
51st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
52nd

Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Trinidad and Tobago
05101520197119932016

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 16.06 units per square kilometre against 16.05 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.01 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd of 203 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 13.32 units per square kilometre 14.78 units per square kilometre 1.46 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 16.15 units per square kilometre 18.02 units per square kilometre 1.87 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 16.92 units per square kilometre 19.19 units per square kilometre 2.27 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 16.44 units per square kilometre 19.83 units per square kilometre 3.39 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 16.57 units per square kilometre 16.05 units per square kilometre 0.5216 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Trinidad and Tobago?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 16.06 units per square kilometre against 16.05 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2016.
What is the difference in secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.01 units per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
25 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2010.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 52nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-general-pupils-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-general-pupils-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, general pupils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 9,094 data points, 1970–2019
Last refreshed

Secondary education, general pupils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.