Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Pakistan: Secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2.81 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
22.01 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
40th
Pakistan rank
41st

Secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Pakistan
05101520197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 22.01 units per square kilometre against 2.81 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 19.2 units per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 7.8 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 40th and Pakistan ranks 41st of 45 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2923 units per square kilometre 2.34 units per square kilometre 2.04 units per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.4906 units per square kilometre 3.51 units per square kilometre 3.02 units per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.5862 units per square kilometre 5.64 units per square kilometre 5.05 units per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 1.34 units per square kilometre 10.26 units per square kilometre 8.92 units per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 2.11 units per square kilometre 15.15 units per square kilometre 13.04 units per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 2.73 units per square kilometre 20.87 units per square kilometre 18.14 units per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 22.01 units per square kilometre against 2.81 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Pakistan?
19.2 units per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Pakistan?
42 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Pakistan rank globally for secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 40th and Pakistan ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Pakistan: Secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-pupils-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-pupils-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/pakistan/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Pakistan: Secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, pupils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 9,655 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary education, pupils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.