East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Pakistan: Secondary education, pupils, per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0001 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd
Pakistan rank
32nd

Secondary education, pupils, per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Pakistan
0000197019972024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 7.4 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1971 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 32nd of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1980s 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1990s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, pupils, per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in secondary education, pupils, per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Pakistan?
0.0001 units per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Pakistan?
43 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Pakistan rank globally for secondary education, pupils, per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 32nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, pupils, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Pakistan: Secondary education, pupils, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-pupils-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-pupils-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/pakistan/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Pakistan: Secondary education, pupils, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, pupils, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 9,500 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Secondary education, pupils divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.