Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.7337 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
30.01 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
6th
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong, China
0102030197119972023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 30.01 units per square kilometre against 0.7337 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 29.28 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 40.9 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 43 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 1.02 units per square kilometre 20.39 units per square kilometre 19.36 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.818 units per square kilometre 23.05 units per square kilometre 22.23 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.7881 units per square kilometre 26.36 units per square kilometre 25.57 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.6893 units per square kilometre 29.42 units per square kilometre 28.73 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.729 units per square kilometre 30.09 units per square kilometre 29.36 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 30.01 units per square kilometre against 0.7337 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
29.28 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
27 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China rank globally for secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-teachers-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-teachers-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 7,445 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary education, teachers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.