East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Singapore: Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.6374 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
18.94 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
7th
Singapore rank
5th

Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Singapore
05101520197019962023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 18.94 units per square kilometre against 0.6374 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 18.3 units per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 29.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 7th and Singapore ranks 5th of 43 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1713 units per square kilometre 11.83 units per square kilometre 11.66 units per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.3639 units per square kilometre 16.96 units per square kilometre 16.6 units per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.5597 units per square kilometre 19.52 units per square kilometre 18.96 units per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.5868 units per square kilometre 20.9 units per square kilometre 20.31 units per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.62 units per square kilometre 19.64 units per square kilometre 19.02 units per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Singapore?
Singapore, at 18.94 units per square kilometre against 0.6374 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Singapore?
18.3 units per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Singapore?
23 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Singapore rank globally for secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 7th and Singapore ranks 5th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Singapore: Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-teachers-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-teachers-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/singapore/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Singapore: Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, teachers, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 7,445 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary education, teachers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.