East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Monaco: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.44 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Monaco
145.53 units per square kilometre
in 2019
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
4th
Monaco rank
1st

Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Monaco
0200400600197019942019

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 145.53 units per square kilometre against 1.44 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 144.09 units per square kilometre.

That makes Monaco's figure about 100.8 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 4th and Monaco ranks 1st of 43 groups.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Monaco Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1023 units per square kilometre 281.37 units per square kilometre 281.27 units per square kilometre Monaco
1980s 0.3114 units per square kilometre 534.78 units per square kilometre 534.47 units per square kilometre Monaco
1990s 0.7309 units per square kilometre 235.57 units per square kilometre 234.84 units per square kilometre Monaco
2000s 1.19 units per square kilometre 233.65 units per square kilometre 232.45 units per square kilometre Monaco
2010s 1.53 units per square kilometre 187.91 units per square kilometre 186.38 units per square kilometre Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Monaco?
Monaco, at 145.53 units per square kilometre against 1.44 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2019.
What is the difference in secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Monaco?
144.09 units per square kilometre, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Monaco?
32 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2018.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Monaco rank globally for secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 4th and Monaco ranks 1st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Monaco: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-vocational-pupils-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-vocational-pupils-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/monaco/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Monaco: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 8,119 data points, 1970–2019
Last refreshed

Secondary education, vocational pupils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.