East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Singapore: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1.44 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Singapore
38.33 units per square kilometre
in 2009
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
4th
Singapore rank
2nd

Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Singapore
01020304050197019942018

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 38.33 units per square kilometre against 1.44 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 36.89 units per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 26.6 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 43 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1082 units per square kilometre 19.28 units per square kilometre 19.17 units per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.3288 units per square kilometre 31.29 units per square kilometre 30.96 units per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.6129 units per square kilometre 33.1 units per square kilometre 32.48 units per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 1.44 units per square kilometre 38.98 units per square kilometre 37.54 units per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Singapore?
Singapore, at 38.33 units per square kilometre against 1.44 units per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2009.
What is the difference in secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Singapore?
36.89 units per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Singapore?
28 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2009.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Singapore rank globally for secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Singapore: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-vocational-pupils-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-vocational-pupils-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/singapore/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Singapore: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, vocational pupils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 8,119 data points, 1970–2019
Last refreshed

Secondary education, vocational pupils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.