East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guatemala: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Guatemala
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2018
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
23rd
Guatemala rank
22nd

Secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Guatemala
0000197019942018

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 3.5 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Guatemala ranks 22nd of 43 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guatemala?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guatemala?
32 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2018.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guatemala rank globally for secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 23rd and Guatemala ranks 22nd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guatemala: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-vocational-pupils-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-education-vocational-pupils-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guatemala/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guatemala: Secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary education, vocational pupils, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 7,767 data points, 1970–2019
Last refreshed

Secondary education, vocational pupils divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.