Latvia vs Poland: Share of students achieving minimum proficiency in reading and math at each education level
Latvia
77.8%
in 2022
Poland
77.0%
in 2022
Latvia rank
13th
Poland rank
14th
Share of students achieving minimum proficiency in reading and math at each education level over time
- Latvia
- Poland
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 77.8% against 77.0% in Poland, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.
Latvia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 14th of 63 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.9% | 76.8% | 1.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 80.4% | 84.6% | 4.1% | Poland |
| 2020s | 77.8% | 77.0% | 0.8% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of students achieving minimum proficiency in reading and math at each education level, Latvia or Poland?
- Latvia, at 77.8% against 77.0% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in share of students achieving minimum proficiency in reading and math at each education level between Latvia and Poland?
- 0.8%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Poland rank globally for share of students achieving minimum proficiency in reading and math at each education level?
- Latvia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 14th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of students achieving minimum proficiency in reading and math at each education level. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (%).