Canada vs Luxembourg: Share of young women vs. men who are not in education, employment or training
Canada
10.8%
in 2023
Luxembourg
10.6%
in 2023
Canada rank
86th
Luxembourg rank
87th
Share of young women vs. men who are not in education, employment or training over time
- Canada
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Canada currently reports 10.8% against 10.6% in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 41 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 86th and Luxembourg ranks 87th of 117 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 19.2% | 12.1% | 7.2% | Canada |
| 1990s | 17.1% | 9.8% | 7.2% | Canada |
| 2000s | 13.0% | 7.1% | 6.0% | Canada |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 5.5% | 6.8% | Canada |
| 2020s | 12.3% | 8.5% | 3.8% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of young women vs. men who are not in education, employment or training, Canada or Luxembourg?
- Canada, at 10.8% against 10.6% in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of young women vs. men who are not in education, employment or training between Canada and Luxembourg?
- 0.2%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Luxembourg?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Luxembourg rank globally for share of young women vs. men who are not in education, employment or training?
- Canada ranks 86th and Luxembourg ranks 87th of 117 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO via World Bank – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of young women vs. men who are not in education, employment or training. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of women aged 15–24 who are not in education, employment, or vocational training.