Fiji vs Namibia: Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male
Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male over time
- Fiji
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 94.0% against 93.6% in Fiji, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 92nd and Namibia ranks 90th of 164 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.6% | 84.9% | 5.6% | Fiji |
| 2000s | 92.6% | 88.8% | 3.8% | Fiji |
| 2010s | 98.7% | 96.3% | 2.5% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male, Fiji or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 94.0% against 93.6% in Fiji as of 2017.
- What is the difference in survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male between Fiji and Namibia?
- 0.4%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2012.
- How do Fiji and Namibia rank globally for survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male?
- Fiji ranks 92nd and Namibia ranks 90th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of a cohort of male students enrolled in the first grade of primary education in a given school year who are expected to reach grade 4, regardless of repetition. Divide the total number of students belonging to a school-cohort who reached each successive grade of primary education by the number of students in the school-cohort i.e. those originally enrolled in the first grade of primary education, and multiply the result by 100. The survival rate is calculated on the basis of the reconstructed cohort method, which uses data on enrolment and repeaters for two consecutive years.