Kyrgyzstan vs Macao: Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male
Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 98.8% against 98.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 39th and Macao ranks 36th of 164 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.3% | 99.3% | 4.0% | Macao |
| 2010s | 97.6% | 98.7% | 1.1% | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male, Kyrgyzstan or Macao?
- Macao, at 98.8% against 98.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male between Kyrgyzstan and Macao?
- 0.1%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Macao?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Macao rank globally for survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 39th and Macao ranks 36th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of a cohort of male students enrolled in the first grade of primary education in a given school year who are expected to reach grade 4, regardless of repetition. Divide the total number of students belonging to a school-cohort who reached each successive grade of primary education by the number of students in the school-cohort i.e. those originally enrolled in the first grade of primary education, and multiply the result by 100. The survival rate is calculated on the basis of the reconstructed cohort method, which uses data on enrolment and repeaters for two consecutive years.