Libya vs Panama: Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male
Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male over time
- Libya
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 90.6% against 89.8% in Libya, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 111th and Panama ranks 108th of 164 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 92.2% | 81.5% | 10.6% | Libya |
| 1980s | 89.8% | 79.0% | 10.8% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male, Libya or Panama?
- Panama, at 90.6% against 89.8% in Libya as of 2013.
- What is the difference in survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male between Libya and Panama?
- 0.8%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Panama?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1980.
- How do Libya and Panama rank globally for survival rate to grade 4 of primary education, male?
- Libya ranks 111th and Panama ranks 108th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of a cohort of male students enrolled in the first grade of primary education in a given school year who are expected to reach grade 4, regardless of repetition. Divide the total number of students belonging to a school-cohort who reached each successive grade of primary education by the number of students in the school-cohort i.e. those originally enrolled in the first grade of primary education, and multiply the result by 100. The survival rate is calculated on the basis of the reconstructed cohort method, which uses data on enrolment and repeaters for two consecutive years.