Comoros vs Latvia: Teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes
Teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes over time
- Comoros
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 7,419 number against 5,538 number in Comoros, a difference of 1,881 number.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Comoros's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 100th of 141 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,793 number | 15,331 number | 13,538 number | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4,730 number | 7,562 number | 2,832 number | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes, Comoros or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 7,419 number against 5,538 number in Comoros as of 2018.
- What is the difference in teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes between Comoros and Latvia?
- 1,881 number, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Comoros and Latvia rank globally for teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes?
- Comoros ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 100th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of teachers in public and private lower secondary education institutions (ISCED 2). Teachers are persons employed full time or part time in an official capacity to guide and direct the learning experience of pupils and students, irrespective of their qualifications or the delivery mechanism, i.e. face-to-face and/or at a distance. This definition excludes educational personnel who have no active teaching duties (e.g. headmasters, headmistresses or principals who do not teach) and persons who work occasionally or in a voluntary capacity in educational institutions.