SDG: Australia and New Zealand vs United Kingdom: Teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate

SDG: Australia and New Zealand
1.2 % change on previous year
in 1998
United Kingdom
-0.3003 % change on previous year
in 2023
SDG: Australia and New Zealand rank
128th
United Kingdom rank
129th

Teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate over time

  • SDG: Australia and New Zealand
  • United Kingdom
-1001020197119972023

How they compare

SDG: Australia and New Zealand currently reports 1.2 % change on previous year against -0.3003 % change on previous year in United Kingdom, a difference of 1.5 % change on previous year.

That makes SDG: Australia and New Zealand's figure about 4.0 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1972 it was United Kingdom ahead.

SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 128th and United Kingdom ranks 129th of 221 groups.

SDG: Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade SDG: Australia and New Zealand United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1970s 6.29 % change on previous year 1.45 % change on previous year 4.84 % change on previous year SDG: Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.8118 % change on previous year 0.3381 % change on previous year 0.4737 % change on previous year SDG: Australia and New Zealand
1990s 3.71 % change on previous year 0.945 % change on previous year 2.76 % change on previous year SDG: Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate, SDG: Australia and New Zealand or United Kingdom?
SDG: Australia and New Zealand, at 1.2 % change on previous year against -0.3003 % change on previous year in United Kingdom as of 1998.
What is the difference in teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate between SDG: Australia and New Zealand and United Kingdom?
1.5 % change on previous year, with SDG: Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for SDG: Australia and New Zealand and United Kingdom?
17 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1992.
How do SDG: Australia and New Zealand and United Kingdom rank globally for teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate?
SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 128th and United Kingdom ranks 129th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

SDG: Australia and New Zealand vs United Kingdom: Teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-annual-growth-rate/sdg-australia-and-new-zealand/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-annual-growth-rate/sdg-australia-and-new-zealand/united-kingdom/">SDG: Australia and New Zealand vs United Kingdom: Teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Teachers in primary education, female (number), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
427 places, 16,499 data points, 1971–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Teachers in primary education, female (number). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.