Canada vs IDA blend: Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled
Canada
96,008 number
in 2000
IDA blend
1.17 million number
in 2019
Canada rank
41st
IDA blend rank
39th
Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled over time
- Canada
- IDA blend
How they compare
IDA blend currently reports 1.17 million number against 96,008 number in Canada, a difference of 1.07 million number.
That makes IDA blend's figure about 12.2 times Canada's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, IDA blend has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 41st and IDA blend ranks 39th of 196 countries.
IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | IDA blend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 94,598 number | 341,965 number | 247,366 number | IDA blend |
| 1990s | 100,593 number | 503,782 number | 403,190 number | IDA blend |
| 2000s | 96,008 number | 628,655 number | 532,647 number | IDA blend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled, Canada or IDA blend?
- IDA blend, at 1.17 million number against 96,008 number in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled between Canada and IDA blend?
- 1.07 million number, with IDA blend ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and IDA blend?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2000.
- How do Canada and IDA blend rank globally for teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled?
- Canada ranks 41st and IDA blend ranks 39th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teachers in primary education, female (number) with 730 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.