Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled
Cuba
64,868 number
in 2019
Sri Lanka
68,746 number
in 2018
Cuba rank
55th
Sri Lanka rank
52nd
Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 68,746 number against 64,868 number in Cuba, a difference of 3,878 number.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 52nd of 196 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 60,910 number | 36,501 number | 24,409 number | Cuba |
| 1990s | 61,966 number | 58,477 number | 3,489 number | Cuba |
| 2000s | 69,392 number | 57,234 number | 12,157 number | Cuba |
| 2010s | 68,598 number | 64,515 number | 4,083 number | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 68,746 number against 64,868 number in Cuba as of 2018.
- What is the difference in teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 3,878 number, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2018.
- How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 52nd of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Teachers in primary education, female (number) with 730 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.