Macau, China vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled

Macau, China
2,349
in 2024
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
828,578
in 2024
Macau, China rank
159th
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank
159th

Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled over time

  • Macau, China
  • UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019972024

How they compare

UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries currently reports 828,578 against 2,349 in Macau, China, a difference of 826,229.

That makes UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries's figure about 352.7 times Macau, China's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 159th and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 159th of 212 countries.

UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 1,308 672,822 671,514 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2000s 1,427 672,001 670,574 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2010s 1,567 726,157 724,590 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2020s 2,224 812,786 810,562 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled, Macau, China or UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries, at 828,578 against 2,349 in Macau, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled between Macau, China and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
826,229, with UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Macau, China and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank globally for teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled?
Macau, China ranks 159th and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 159th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-gaps-filled/macao-sar-china/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-gaps-filled/macao-sar-china/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/">Macau, China vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Teachers in primary education, female (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
433 places, 18,584 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Teachers in primary education, female (number) with 851 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.