Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Luxembourg: Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
0.1203 number per square kilometre
in 2019
Luxembourg
1.39 number per square kilometre
in 2018
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
29th
Luxembourg rank
32nd

Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
  • Luxembourg
00.511.5197019942019

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1.39 number per square kilometre against 0.1203 number per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 1.27 number per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 11.6 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 45 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1143 number per square kilometre 0.8239 number per square kilometre 0.7096 number per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 0.1168 number per square kilometre 1.24 number per square kilometre 1.12 number per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre, Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 1.39 number per square kilometre against 0.1203 number per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre between Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Luxembourg?
1.27 number per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Luxembourg?
15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
How do Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Luxembourg rank globally for teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre?
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Luxembourg: Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-per-square-kilometre-2/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-per-square-kilometre-2/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/luxembourg/">Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Luxembourg: Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre
Unit
number per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 7,320 data points, 1970–2020
Last refreshed

Teachers in primary education, female (number) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.