Low income vs Rwanda: Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre

Low income
0.0807 number per square kilometre
in 2019
Rwanda
0.9868 number per square kilometre
in 2019
Low income rank
43rd
Rwanda rank
43rd

Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre over time

  • Low income
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.81197119952019

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.9868 number per square kilometre against 0.0807 number per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 0.9061 number per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 12.2 times Low income's.

Across all 41 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0176 number per square kilometre 0.0853 number per square kilometre 0.0677 number per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0268 number per square kilometre 0.2502 number per square kilometre 0.2234 number per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.0338 number per square kilometre 0.4204 number per square kilometre 0.3866 number per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.0508 number per square kilometre 0.6197 number per square kilometre 0.5689 number per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0716 number per square kilometre 0.8966 number per square kilometre 0.8251 number per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre, Low income or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.9868 number per square kilometre against 0.0807 number per square kilometre in Low income as of 2019.
What is the difference in teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre between Low income and Rwanda?
0.9061 number per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Rwanda?
41 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2019.
How do Low income and Rwanda rank globally for teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre?
Low income ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Rwanda: Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-per-square-kilometre-2/low-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-primary-education-female-number-per-square-kilometre-2/low-income/rwanda/">Low income vs Rwanda: Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Teachers in primary education, female (number), per square kilometre
Unit
number per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 7,320 data points, 1970–2020
Last refreshed

Teachers in primary education, female (number) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.