Poland vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled

Poland
322,900
in 2025
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
10.33 million
in 2024
Poland rank
26th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
29th

Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled over time

  • Poland
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M197019972025

How they compare

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries currently reports 10.33 million against 322,900 in Poland, a difference of 10.01 million.

That makes UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries's figure about 32.0 times Poland's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 26th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 29th of 214 countries.

UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2000s 286,729 7.91 million 7.62 million UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2010s 274,390 9.16 million 8.89 million UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2020s 325,652 10.01 million 9.68 million UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled, Poland or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, at 10.33 million against 322,900 in Poland as of 2024.
What is the difference in teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled between Poland and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
10.01 million, with UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Poland and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled?
Poland ranks 26th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 29th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-secondary-education-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/poland/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/teachers-in-secondary-education-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/poland/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Poland vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
435 places, 17,549 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number) with 768 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.