Ecuador vs Low income: Teachers in tertiary education programmes, female
Teachers in tertiary education programmes, female over time
- Ecuador
- Low income
How they compare
Low income currently reports 48,480 number against 15,396 number in Ecuador, a difference of 33,084 number.
That makes Low income's figure about 3.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Low income has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 39th and Low income ranks 39th of 159 countries.
Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,955 number | 22,526 number | 19,571 number | Low income |
| 2000s | 7,368 number | 35,961 number | 28,593 number | Low income |
| 2010s | 14,493 number | 46,230 number | 31,737 number | Low income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher teachers in tertiary education programmes, female, Ecuador or Low income?
- Low income, at 48,480 number against 15,396 number in Ecuador as of 2016.
- What is the difference in teachers in tertiary education programmes, female between Ecuador and Low income?
- 33,084 number, with Low income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Low income?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2015.
- How do Ecuador and Low income rank globally for teachers in tertiary education programmes, female?
- Ecuador ranks 39th and Low income ranks 39th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Teachers in tertiary education programmes, female (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total number of female teachers in public and private tertiary education institutions (ISCED 5-8). Teachers are persons employed full time or part time in an official capacity to guide and direct the learning experience of pupils and students, irrespective of their qualifications or the delivery mechanism, i.e. face-to-face and/or at a distance. This definition excludes educational personnel who have no active teaching duties (e.g. headmasters, headmistresses or principals who do not teach) and persons who work occasionally or in a voluntary capacity in educational institutions.