Malta vs Namibia: Theoretical duration of lower secondary education
Malta
3 years
in 2020
Namibia
3 years
in 2020
Malta rank
81st
Namibia rank
81st
Theoretical duration of lower secondary education over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 3 years against 3 years in Namibia, a difference of 0 years.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 81st of 209 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5 years | 3 years | 2 years | Malta |
| 1980s | 5 years | 3 years | 2 years | Malta |
| 1990s | 5 years | 3 years | 2 years | Malta |
| 2000s | 5 years | 3 years | 2 years | Malta |
| 2010s | 3.4 years | 3 years | 0.4 years | Malta |
| 2020s | 3 years | 3 years | 0 years | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher theoretical duration of lower secondary education, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 3 years against 3 years in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in theoretical duration of lower secondary education between Malta and Namibia?
- 0 years, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for theoretical duration of lower secondary education?
- Malta ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 81st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Theoretical duration of lower secondary education (years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of grades (years) in lower secondary education.