Malaysia vs New Caledonia: Theoretical duration of upper secondary education
Malaysia
3 years
in 2020
New Caledonia
3 years
in 2020
Malaysia rank
52nd
New Caledonia rank
52nd
Theoretical duration of upper secondary education over time
- Malaysia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3 years against 3 years in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 years.
Across all 16 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 52nd of 209 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3 years | 3 years | 0 years | — |
| 1990s | 3 years | 3 years | 0 years | — |
| 2010s | 3 years | 3 years | 0 years | — |
| 2020s | 3 years | 3 years | 0 years | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher theoretical duration of upper secondary education, Malaysia or New Caledonia?
- Malaysia, at 3 years against 3 years in New Caledonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in theoretical duration of upper secondary education between Malaysia and New Caledonia?
- 0 years, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and New Caledonia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2020.
- How do Malaysia and New Caledonia rank globally for theoretical duration of upper secondary education?
- Malaysia ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 52nd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Theoretical duration of upper secondary education (years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of grades (years) in upper secondary education.