Latvia vs Philippines: Trained teachers in lower secondary education
Latvia
100.0%
in 2022
Philippines
100.0%
in 2024
Latvia rank
1st
Philippines rank
1st
Trained teachers in lower secondary education over time
- Latvia
- Philippines
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Philippines, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 83 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trained teachers in lower secondary education, Latvia or Philippines?
- Latvia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Philippines as of 2022.
- What is the difference in trained teachers in lower secondary education between Latvia and Philippines?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Philippines?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Philippines rank globally for trained teachers in lower secondary education?
- Latvia ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Trained teachers in lower secondary education (% of total teachers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trained teachers in lower secondary education are the percentage of lower secondary school teachers who have received the minimum organized teacher training (pre-service or in-service) required for teaching in a given country.