High income vs Latvia: Trained teachers in secondary education, male
High income
90.8%
in 2021
Latvia
100.0%
in 2022
High income rank
2nd
Latvia rank
1st
Trained teachers in secondary education, male over time
- High income
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.0% against 90.8% in High income, a difference of 9.2%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times High income's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
High income ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 36 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 94.1% | 100.0% | 5.9% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 91.7% | 100.0% | 8.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trained teachers in secondary education, male, High income or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 100.0% against 90.8% in High income as of 2022.
- What is the difference in trained teachers in secondary education, male between High income and Latvia?
- 9.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do High income and Latvia rank globally for trained teachers in secondary education, male?
- High income ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 36 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Trained teachers in secondary education, male (% of male teachers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trained teachers in secondary education are the percentage of secondary school teachers who have received the minimum organized teacher training (pre-service or in-service) required for teaching in a given country.