Latvia vs OECD members: Trained teachers in upper secondary education
Latvia
100.0%
in 2022
OECD members
94.1%
in 2020
Latvia rank
1st
OECD members rank
3rd
Trained teachers in upper secondary education over time
- Latvia
- OECD members
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.0% against 94.1% in OECD members, a difference of 5.9%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times OECD members's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 1st and OECD members ranks 3rd of 80 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 100.0% | 93.3% | 6.7% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 94.1% | 5.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trained teachers in upper secondary education, Latvia or OECD members?
- Latvia, at 100.0% against 94.1% in OECD members as of 2022.
- What is the difference in trained teachers in upper secondary education between Latvia and OECD members?
- 5.9%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and OECD members?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Latvia and OECD members rank globally for trained teachers in upper secondary education?
- Latvia ranks 1st and OECD members ranks 3rd of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Trained teachers in upper secondary education (% of total teachers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trained teachers in upper secondary education are the percentage of upper secondary school teachers who have received the minimum organized teacher training (pre-service or in-service) required for teaching in a given country.