Labor force, total, per unit of GDP in Low income
Low income: Labor force, total, per unit of GDP was 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ▼ Falling
Labor force, total, per unit of GDP in Low income, 1990–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Low income recorded 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP for labor force, total, per unit of gdp in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.
That represents a change of down 3.1% on the previous year and down 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, labor force, total, per unit of gdp in Low income peaked at 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places Low income 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 36 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0013 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 1 Burundi 0.0019 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 2 Madagascar 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 3 Mozambique 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Central African Republic 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP compare
More education data for Low income
- Population ages 0-14 40.9% (2025)
- Population ages 15-64 55.8% (2025)
- Primary education, teachers, gaps filled 2.88 million (2024)
- School enrollment, primary 97.6% (2024)
- Primary education, teachers 2.88 million (2024)
- Primary education, teachers, per capita 0.0039 units per person (2024)
- Primary education, teachers, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
- School enrollment, primary, female 94.5% (2024)
- School enrollment, primary, male 100.6% (2024)
- Labor force, female 43.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is labor force, total, per unit of gdp in Low income?
- Labor force, total, per unit of gdp in Low income was 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest labor force, total, per unit of gdp recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0015 units per US$ of GDP in 1996.
- What is the lowest labor force, total, per unit of gdp recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Low income rank for labor force, total, per unit of gdp?
- Low income ranks 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2025.
- Is labor force, total, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Labor force, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Labor force, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Labor force, total ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Labor force, total International Labour Organization (ILO), type: estimates based on external database
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Labor force, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.