Mali vs Norway: Current education expenditure, tertiary
Current education expenditure, tertiary over time
- Mali
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 90.3% against 90.2% in Mali, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Norway ahead.
Mali ranks 64th and Norway ranks 63rd of 112 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.4% | 94.0% | 6.6% | Norway |
| 2010s | 90.5% | 90.4% | 0.1% | Mali |
| 2020s | 91.9% | 90.2% | 1.7% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher current education expenditure, tertiary, Mali or Norway?
- Norway, at 90.3% against 90.2% in Mali as of 2022.
- What is the difference in current education expenditure, tertiary between Mali and Norway?
- 0.1%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Norway?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Mali and Norway rank globally for current education expenditure, tertiary?
- Mali ranks 64th and Norway ranks 63rd of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Current education expenditure, tertiary (% of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Current expenditure is expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Current expenditure is consumed within the current year and would have to be renewed if needed in the following year. It includes staff compensation and current expenditure other than for staff compensation (ex. on teaching materials, ancillary services and administration).