Peru vs Tunisia: Current education expenditure, tertiary
Current education expenditure, tertiary over time
- Peru
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 76.4% against 74.8% in Peru, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 112 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88.8% | 73.6% | 15.1% | Peru |
| 2000s | 81.1% | 78.0% | 3.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 82.2% | 76.4% | 5.8% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher current education expenditure, tertiary, Peru or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 76.4% against 74.8% in Peru as of 2010.
- What is the difference in current education expenditure, tertiary between Peru and Tunisia?
- 1.6%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tunisia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2010.
- How do Peru and Tunisia rank globally for current education expenditure, tertiary?
- Peru ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Current education expenditure, tertiary (% of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Current expenditure is expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Current expenditure is consumed within the current year and would have to be renewed if needed in the following year. It includes staff compensation and current expenditure other than for staff compensation (ex. on teaching materials, ancillary services and administration).