Croatia vs Italy: Current education expenditure, total
Current education expenditure, total over time
- Croatia
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 95.0% against 94.4% in Croatia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Italy ahead.
Croatia ranks 46th and Italy ranks 43rd of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.8% | 93.2% | 0.7% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 95.4% | 95.7% | 0.3% | Italy |
| 2020s | 93.2% | 94.8% | 1.6% | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher current education expenditure, total, Croatia or Italy?
- Italy, at 95.0% against 94.4% in Croatia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in current education expenditure, total between Croatia and Italy?
- 0.6%, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Italy?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Italy rank globally for current education expenditure, total?
- Croatia ranks 46th and Italy ranks 43rd of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Current education expenditure, total (% of total expenditure in public institutions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Current expenditure is expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Current expenditure is consumed within the current year and would have to be renewed if needed in the following year. It includes staff compensation and current expenditure other than for staff compensation (ex. on teaching materials, ancillary services and administration).