Estonia vs Malta: Current education expenditure, total
Current education expenditure, total over time
- Estonia
- Malta
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 88.1% against 87.9% in Malta, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malta ahead.
Estonia ranks 94th and Malta ranks 96th of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.8% | 94.4% | 6.7% | Malta |
| 2010s | 90.2% | 87.6% | 2.5% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 88.1% | 88.3% | 0.2% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher current education expenditure, total, Estonia or Malta?
- Estonia, at 88.1% against 87.9% in Malta as of 2022.
- What is the difference in current education expenditure, total between Estonia and Malta?
- 0.2%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malta?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Estonia and Malta rank globally for current education expenditure, total?
- Estonia ranks 94th and Malta ranks 96th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Current education expenditure, total (% of total expenditure in public institutions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Current expenditure is expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Current expenditure is consumed within the current year and would have to be renewed if needed in the following year. It includes staff compensation and current expenditure other than for staff compensation (ex. on teaching materials, ancillary services and administration).