Guinea vs Mexico: Current education expenditure, total
Current education expenditure, total over time
- Guinea
- Mexico
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 98.6% against 97.8% in Mexico, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mexico ahead.
Guinea ranks 17th and Mexico ranks 20th of 123 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.8% | 96.2% | 16.5% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 89.2% | 96.7% | 7.6% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 98.6% | 97.9% | 0.7% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher current education expenditure, total, Guinea or Mexico?
- Guinea, at 98.6% against 97.8% in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in current education expenditure, total between Guinea and Mexico?
- 0.8%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Mexico rank globally for current education expenditure, total?
- Guinea ranks 17th and Mexico ranks 20th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Current education expenditure, total (% of total expenditure in public institutions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Current expenditure is expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Current expenditure is consumed within the current year and would have to be renewed if needed in the following year. It includes staff compensation and current expenditure other than for staff compensation (ex. on teaching materials, ancillary services and administration).