Monaco vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)

Monaco
12.41 % change on previous year
in 2024
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
7.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
Monaco rank
21st
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank
23rd

Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number) over time

  • Monaco
  • UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
-30-20-1001020197119972024

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 12.41 % change on previous year against 7.46 % change on previous year in UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries, a difference of 4.95 % change on previous year.

That makes Monaco's figure about 1.7 times UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Monaco ahead.

Monaco ranks 21st and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 23rd of 189 countries.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2010s 5.83 % change on previous year 2.64 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year Monaco
2020s 6.19 % change on previous year 2.46 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number), Monaco or UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
Monaco, at 12.41 % change on previous year against 7.46 % change on previous year in UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number) between Monaco and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
4.95 % change on previous year, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do Monaco and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank globally for enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)?
Monaco ranks 21st and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 23rd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-both-sexes-number-annual-growth-rate/monaco/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/enrolment-in-tertiary-education-all-programmes-both-sexes-number-annual-growth-rate/monaco/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/">Monaco vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
410 places, 17,230 data points, 1971–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.