Lithuania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Lithuania
106.2%
in 2018
Sao Tome and Principe
105.5%
in 2017
Lithuania rank
44th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
46th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Lithuania
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 106.2% against 105.5% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 44th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 46th of 188 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.4% | 63.0% | 42.5% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 104.3% | 95.0% | 9.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Lithuania or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Lithuania, at 106.2% against 105.5% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.7%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Lithuania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Lithuania ranks 44th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 46th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.