Low income vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Low income
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 105.5% against 48.1% in Low income, a difference of 57.4%.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.2 times Low income's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 45th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 46th of 45 groups.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.2% | 63.0% | 21.8% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 47.9% | 95.0% | 47.1% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes, Low income or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 105.5% against 48.1% in Low income as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes between Low income and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 57.4%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
- How do Low income and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes?
- Low income ranks 45th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 46th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.