MDG: Oceania vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
MDG: Oceania
59.8%
in 2019
Rwanda
71.5%
in 2024
MDG: Oceania rank
161st
Rwanda rank
160th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- MDG: Oceania
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 71.5% against 59.8% in MDG: Oceania, a difference of 11.7%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times MDG: Oceania's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, MDG: Oceania has been ahead every year.
MDG: Oceania ranks 161st and Rwanda ranks 160th of 221 groups.
MDG: Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MDG: Oceania | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.9% | 8.7% | 50.2% | MDG: Oceania |
| 2000s | 63.9% | 20.4% | 43.5% | MDG: Oceania |
| 2010s | 67.2% | 50.8% | 16.4% | MDG: Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, MDG: Oceania or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 71.5% against 59.8% in MDG: Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between MDG: Oceania and Rwanda?
- 11.7%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Oceania and Rwanda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do MDG: Oceania and Rwanda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- MDG: Oceania ranks 161st and Rwanda ranks 160th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release