Rwanda vs SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female

Rwanda
71.5%
in 2024
SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
59.8%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
160th
SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) rank
161st

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time

  • Rwanda
  • SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
020406080199720102024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 71.5% against 59.8% in SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 11.7%.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 160th and SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ranks 161st of 199 countries.

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
1990s 8.7% 58.9% 50.2% SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
2000s 20.4% 63.9% 43.5% SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
2010s 50.8% 67.2% 16.4% SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Rwanda or SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)?
Rwanda, at 71.5% against 59.8% in SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Rwanda and SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)?
11.7%, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)?
21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
How do Rwanda and SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
Rwanda ranks 160th and SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ranks 161st of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/rwanda/sdg-oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/rwanda/sdg-oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/">Rwanda vs SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,391 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release