Denmark vs Late-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Denmark
- Late-demographic dividend
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 119.6% against 99.3% in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 20.3%.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 13th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Late-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 124.3% | 82.8% | 41.5% | Denmark |
| 2000s | 120.7% | 92.2% | 28.6% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 118.0% | 96.2% | 21.8% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Denmark or Late-demographic dividend?
- Denmark, at 119.6% against 99.3% in Late-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Denmark and Late-demographic dividend?
- 20.3%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Late-demographic dividend?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do Denmark and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Denmark ranks 13th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.