Kazakhstan vs Middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Kazakhstan
112.5%
in 2019
Middle income
88.4%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
21st
Middle income rank
24th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Kazakhstan
- Middle income
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 112.5% against 88.4% in Middle income, a difference of 24.1%.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Middle income's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Middle income ranks 24th of 188 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.1% | 68.6% | 26.5% | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 97.5% | 76.3% | 21.1% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 109.6% | 86.6% | 22.9% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Kazakhstan or Middle income?
- Kazakhstan, at 112.5% against 88.4% in Middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Kazakhstan and Middle income?
- 24.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Middle income?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Middle income ranks 24th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.