Post-demographic dividend vs Sweden: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Post-demographic dividend
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 121.2% against 102.3% in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 18.9%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Post-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sweden ahead.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Post-demographic dividend | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 102.0% | 115.2% | 13.2% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 102.9% | 106.6% | 3.8% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 102.9% | 111.3% | 8.5% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Post-demographic dividend or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 121.2% against 102.3% in Post-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Post-demographic dividend and Sweden?
- 18.9%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Post-demographic dividend and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2018.
- How do Post-demographic dividend and Sweden rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 11th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.