Hong Kong, China vs Small states: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Small states
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 109.8% against 81.2% in Small states, a difference of 28.6%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Small states's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 29th and Small states ranks 31st of 188 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.0% | 67.3% | 26.6% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 99.5% | 74.8% | 24.7% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 106.9% | 80.0% | 26.9% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Hong Kong, China or Small states?
- Hong Kong, China, at 109.8% against 81.2% in Small states as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Hong Kong, China and Small states?
- 28.6%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Small states?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Small states rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 29th and Small states ranks 31st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.