Kazakhstan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Kazakhstan
111.4%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
110.0%
in 2016
Kazakhstan rank
26th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
28th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Kazakhstan
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 111.4% against 110.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 26th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.3% | 91.9% | 4.6% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 97.9% | 106.3% | 8.4% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 107.6% | 112.5% | 4.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Kazakhstan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Kazakhstan, at 111.4% against 110.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Kazakhstan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 1.4%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2016.
- How do Kazakhstan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Kazakhstan ranks 26th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 28th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.