ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
0.9818 GPIA
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.991 GPIA
in 2013
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
125th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender over time

  • ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81199920112024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.991 GPIA against 0.9818 GPIA in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417), a difference of 0.0092 GPIA.

Across all 7 years both countries report, ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) has been ahead every year.

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 221 groups.

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9895 GPIA 0.9457 GPIA 0.0438 GPIA ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
2000s 0.98 GPIA 0.9607 GPIA 0.0193 GPIA ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
2010s 0.9941 GPIA 0.9918 GPIA 0.0023 GPIA ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender, ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.991 GPIA against 0.9818 GPIA in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) as of 2013.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender between ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Zimbabwe?
0.0092 GPIA, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
How do ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender?
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/zimbabwe/">ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,306 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release