Latvia vs Pre-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- Latvia
- Pre-demographic dividend
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 103.9% against 68.8% in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 35.1%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.5 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 44th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 44th of 193 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Pre-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.9% | 44.1% | 46.8% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 100.1% | 56.7% | 43.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 104.2% | 68.0% | 36.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Latvia or Pre-demographic dividend?
- Latvia, at 103.9% against 68.8% in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Latvia and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 35.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 44th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.