Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female

Latvia
103.9%
in 2018
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
71.0%
in 2018
Latvia rank
44th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
42nd

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time

  • Latvia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
20406080100197019942018

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 103.9% against 71.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 32.9%.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 44th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 42nd of 193 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 90.9% 47.5% 43.4% Latvia
2000s 100.1% 59.3% 40.8% Latvia
2010s 104.2% 70.4% 33.8% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Latvia or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Latvia, at 103.9% against 71.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
32.9%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
How do Latvia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
Latvia ranks 44th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 42nd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent/latvia/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-secondary-female-percent/latvia/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Latvia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
238 places, 7,794 data points, 1970–2020
Last refreshed

Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.