Low income vs Oman: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
Low income
69.2%
in 2018
Oman
104.5%
in 2019
Low income rank
43rd
Oman rank
43rd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- Low income
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 104.5% against 69.2% in Low income, a difference of 35.3%.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.5 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 43rd and Oman ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Low income averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 31.9% | 9.1% | 22.8% | Low income |
| 1980s | 38.1% | 38.2% | 0.0% | Oman |
| 1990s | 38.7% | 73.5% | 34.7% | Oman |
| 2000s | 54.8% | 89.9% | 35.0% | Oman |
| 2010s | 68.2% | 104.8% | 36.7% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Low income or Oman?
- Oman, at 104.5% against 69.2% in Low income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Low income and Oman?
- 35.3%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Oman?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2018.
- How do Low income and Oman rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- Low income ranks 43rd and Oman ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.